directory
Back Index Next

Home -> Online Books -> Ethics of Islam

23- NOT KEEPING THE PROMISE

Not keeping one's promise also causes anger (Ghadab). We already defined above that a promise made by only one side was called "promise" (Va'd) and a promise by both parties was called agreement "Ahd". A promise of punishment is called "Va'id". Not keeping this kind of promise (Va'id) is a kindness. It is prohibited (Haram) to promise by lying. Not keeping this type of promise is an additional sin. Keeping such a promise will cause the sin of lying to be forgiven. Illegal agreement of sales (Fasid bay) is also similar to this. Canceling such a sales agreement and giving up that sale is necessary (Wajib). When they cancel the sales agreement and ask for repentance their sin will be forgiven. But if they do not cancel this type of illegal sales agreement their sin would be doubled. It is necessary to carry out one's promise.

 

In one hadith, Rasulullah, peace be upon him, said, "The sign of hypocrisy is three: lying, not keeping one's promise and breaking the trust (Amanat)." If one is not able to keep one's promise because of circumstances beyond his power then it would not be a sign of hypocrisy. Not keeping the promised safekeeping or trust "Amanat" with respect to properties, a word, or a secret is hypocrisy. In a hadith which is written in famous hadith book Sahih al-Bukhari and reported by Amr ibn As, may Allahu ta'ala be pleased with him, Rasulullah, peace be upon him, said, "Four things are the sign of hypocrisy: violating one's trust, lying, not keeping one's promise and breaking an agreement without informing the other party (Gadr) and not telling the truth at a judicial court". Ibn Al-Hajar, may Allahu ta'ala be pleased with him, said the definition of hypocrisy is lack of correspondence of one's inner self to his behavior. Being hypocritical on subjects relating to the knowledge of faith is disbelief (Kufr). Being hypocritical in one's words or deeds is forbidden (Haram). The disbelief caused by hypocrisy with respect to the belief system is much worse than other types of disbelief. Making a promise (Va'd) with the intention of fulfilling the promise in the future is permissible (Jaiz) or even rewarding (Thawab). Fullfilling this kind of promise is not "Wajib", but it is "Mustahab." Not fulfilling it would be slightly disliked (Tanzih al-makruh.) In one hadith, Rasulullah, peace be upon him, said, "It would not be a sin if one is not able to fulfill a promise that one has given with the intention of fulfilling it." According to the teachings of Hanafi and Shafi'i scholars, may Allahu ta'ala, be well pleased with them, not keeping a promise without an excuse is disliked (Makruh) and with an excuse is permissible but it is necessary (Wajib) to inform the involved party. According to the teachings of Hanbali scholars, may Allahu ta'ala, be well pleased with them, fulfilling the given promise (Va'd) is "Wajib." Not fulfilling it is forbidden (Haram.) Performing a deed which is sanctioned (Sahih) according to the teachings of the four schools of thought is piety (Taqwa).

 

It is necessary (Wajib) for the followers of the teachings of all four Imams (The founders of the four schools of thought "Madhhab") to love each other and to pray for each other and not to fall into fanaticism while following the teachings of their scholars (Imams). It is not permissible to make "Talfik" according to the unanimous teachings of all four schools of thought. "Talfik" means doing one's deeds or actions according to the easy decisions of the four schools of thought. Action or deed done according to "Talfik" would not be correct (Sahih) in any of the schools of thought (Madhhabs). But it is permissible to do one's deeds or actions by following the easy decisions of only one school of thought.

 

[In order to perform any deed or action, one should form his intention to follow any one of the four schools of thought and then do the deed or action according to the teachings prescribed by that school of thought. In every school of thought there are two ways of doing an action or deed, the easy way and the difficult way. The easy way is called facility (Ruhsat) and the difficult way is called "Azimat". Doing one's deeds or actions according to the "Azimat" is better if one is strong and his situation fits. Soul (Nafs) does not like to do difficult things and doing it so weakens the soul. Worships were imposed on us in order to weaken the soul because the soul is an enemy of the spirit and Allahu ta'ala. It is necessary to weaken the soul so that it will not be able to do its monstrosities. But it should not be killed because it is the servant of the body. It is the stupid and ignorant servant. Those who are sick, weak or in a difficult situation should leave the way of "Azimat", and do their actions according to the facility (Ruhsat) so that they may not fall into a state of not performing their deeds. If it is difficult to do a deed or action even according to the facility of one's own school of thought, one may do that deed according to another one of the three school of thought in which doing that deed is permissible.]



HizmetBooks © 1998

See our Important Disclaimers and Legal Information